Clinical AI workflow vs Defense AI workflow.
Use this page when the buyer is choosing which review workflow fits the deployment. Clinical AI workflow speaks to health systems, clinical-AI committees, hospital compliance, payor IT and cites HHS §1557, HIPAA-out-of-scope by construction, FDA SaMD / PCCP, ONC HTI-1 predictive-DSI transparency, CMS utilization rules; Defense AI workflow speaks to program offices, ATO-package owners, JADC2 staff and cites NIST AI RMF, OMB M-25-21/22, DoW RAI S&IP, CMMC Level 2 (Level 3 on request), DoW IL2 packageable. Both emit the same evidence record for fielded AI tools: seven Astrolabe measurement-engine fields documented at /schema, with the evidence check recomputing either record byte-for-byte in the browser.
Side-by-side.
vs
War-board — Defense AI workflow
Defense AI workflow: battlestaff, intel cells, mission planning, and decision-support agents
Defense AI workflow: NIST AI RMF, OMB M-25-21/22, DoW RAI S&IP, CMMC Level 2 (Level 3 on request), DoW IL2 packageable
Defense AI workflow: program offices, ATO-package owners, JADC2 staff
Which kit fits the buyer.
If the buyer's question spans both domains — e.g. a defense-medical research office, a school-district legal opinion — the answer is “both kits, one bundle”: the Astrolabe measurement method is the same, so one Phase 0 sweep can emit two cover sheets without redoing the math.